Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Brita: The High Fashion Accessory To Water


Chapter 3
Case Study 3-A
Corporate Responsibility:
Just Selling or Doing Well by Doing Good?

I chose to do a case study that frankly I thought I had her figured out. Water is the biggest Diva. She gets so much free press and exposure and like Angelina Jolie, she still retains a bit of mystery. The issue at hand was regarding a NY Times article stating the bottled water lost in sustainability, the water filter industry was about to launch. In 2008, the Brita Company was about to launch its Go Green campaign with the introduction of its do anti-bottled website: filterforgood.com. What more could a green advocate want? According to Beth Terry from Southern CA, she wanted Brita’s parent company Clorox to take on the shared responsibility of recycling all of its filters. But she did not stop there, her evidence was that Europe’s Brita affiliate had set up a recycling system and therefore they should have had this all planned out. 
Terry’s claim was based in truth. America does not have any recycling facilities set up for water filters. This would make Brita’s Go Green campaign void for the green citizens of the United States of America. At first Clorox a public relations responded that the cost of setting recycling centers for the entire country would be an expense that would put them out of business. The article exposing this dilemma was written by Mya Frazier published on October 5, 2008 (Times Pressure to Recycle Filter). As a long time consumer of Brita water filter, I am outraged the press. I have not been made aware I was killing the natural resources of Mother Earth. According to the SJC Code of Ethics, Minimize Harm, it states, “Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage.” 
The introduction of social media and random claims by anonymous websites, I would agree the contextual reason “public opinion is hardly monolithic” (Cooper page 23). This sparked many questions like why “Postmodernism reject the correspondence theory of truth?” (Patterson &Wilkins page 26). If I applied Plato’s theory that “truth was knowable only to the human intellect-it could not be touched or verified” (Patterson & Wilkens page 22) to question about Brita’s intent on Sales or Doing Good, then I would have to become an intellectual on the very illusive matter of justice.  I would also have to disqualify Brita and Terry has being sincere. For questions can lead to answers, that my postulate a fact. As I was failing at the  “Seek Truth and Report it” method, (Society of Professional Journalists ), I surrendered to the Platonic unverifiable truth theory. On Saturday I decided it was time to do a  severe “Qualitative Study” (MaxWell Chpt. 7). I designed a macro study based on different views and methods of water filtration and recycling.
I created a simple interactive model study in where I could see on paper all the different views, concepts and information. I would then evaluate how data “components may affect and be affected by one another” (Maxwell page 215). A simple setup of source, information question, rating and answer for meaning would bring me closer to the truth. After three days of readings and logging data, something unexpected seem to appear in my study. I could make out connections from understanding a meaning to source information. I intuitively started seeking out the right sources and filtering out the babble. The framework based on questions and answer has given me the confidence to ethically expose the issue presented in case 3-A.
The corporate entity is not a real person and throughout history people were aware of the fact. A consumer like filter loving Terry and a corporate giant like Clorox is a relationship that is not real. According to Forbes Magazine articles and blogs (blogs.forbes), the term Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) viewed as a risk factor and a marketing strategy. They acknowledged Unilever as one of the top CSR companies quoted, “Unilever CEO Paul Polman really spoke the language of CSR as value – not just donations” (Forbes.com).  The action of value to the consumer is a big seller, even if the consumer doesn’t understand why a product is green. They are more likely to buy it on the humanitarian principle of recycling. Furthermore as consumers start accepting these values, they also accept corporations as real people that care more than just profits. The new bottom line is the transformation of business from money addiction to consumer BFF’s.
The article in question about Brita’s intention is yes to both. It is just selling and it is doing well by doing good. The Corporate Social Responsibility makes consumers feel like they are being heard. It feeds into the need of trust when buying a product. Beth Terry’s action of applying Extend Producer Responsibility (EPR) is Kantanian but in no way Golden. “Why do you think environmental policies so often fail to address environmental problems?  Because legislators are more interested in collecting money and votes than in “catering” to “extremists” was the response given by Richard Porter, the pragmatic author of “The Economics of Waste” (everydaytrash.com).
            The alarming data about high cost of recycling and consumer illusions of unintellectual social responsible actions may risk our democracy. Beth Terry started a campaign toward a corporation that was adhering to their legal responsibility. On January 29, 2009 she had collect six hundred and  eleven water cartridge filters. If she only knew in 2002, 1.1 billion people lacked access to improved water sources, which represented 17% of the global population and nearly 4 million children died due to water related diseases (WorldWaterCouncil.org).
United Nations Report 2000
            America is the biggest consumer of water. Postmodern ethics is the causal factor of this case study. The ethical decision here relies on utilitarian principles of consequence. For the postmodern green advocate, the luxury of Brita filter is just a high fashion accessory of water.



  
I will be posting a second part to this blog where I will attempt to "frame" the  Recycling process, New water innovation, Alhusser, Marxism and  democratic relativism.









Works Cited:
Patterson P. & Wilkens L.,Media Ethics: Issues & Ethics 7th Ed., McGraw-Hill, NY 2011
Cooper, T. Between The Summits: What Americans Think About Media Ethics, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2008
Maxwell, J Designing a Qualitative Study Chapter 7 
filterforgood.com.
http://www.takebackthefilter.org/ 
NY Times Pressure to Recycle Water Filters
Society of Professional Journalists  
blogs.forbes
Althusser, Louis P., Politics and History, New Left Books: London (1972)




Works Referenced:

Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws Translated by Thomas Nugent, Bell & Sons,  Ltd., London   1914  
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/reporter/greengds.shtm




No comments:

Post a Comment